Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 130

Re: Future directions for C# and Visual Basic

So I'm sure Anders considered having the default for async calls be await without having to type the await keyword allowing for a smaller more concise format.  I know this would not work for backwards compatibility but it could be turned on with a project setting or something of the sort.  Then there would be a new keyword to use if you don't want to await.  I have spent only 2 second thinking of this so I'm sure there are all sorts of reason why this is a bad idea that I have not thought of yet but could so you speak on some of the decisions around the await keyword.  Thanks.

posted by AceHack


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 130

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>